Quaid-e-Azam law College

Always bear in mind that your own resolution to succeed is more important than any one thing.

Quaid-e-Azam law College

Identify your problems but give your power and energy to solutions.

Quaid-e-Azam Law college

The only true wisdom is knowing that you know nothing.

Quaid-e-Azam law College

Things work out best for those who make the best of how things work out

Quaid-e-Azam law College

If u don't like any rule,just follow it, reach the top and change the rule........ .

Tuesday, 19 March 2013

Act + Mens rea = Crime


Act + Mens rea = Crime
Act alone is never an offense; a mere act is never punishable under the law.
Act + Mens rea constitutes a crime.
Mens rea means intention to commit a crime or criminal guilt.
In law there is no such thing as example, only illustrations.
Legal definition of Mens rea:
As an element of criminal responsibility, a guilty mind; a guilty or wrongful purpose; a criminal intent. Guilty knowledge and wilfulness.
A fundamental principle of Criminal law is that a crime consists of both a mental and a physical element. Mens rea, a person's awareness of the fact that his or her conduct is criminal, is the mental element, and actus reus, the act itself, is the physical element.


Intentions:
Where the consequences of some act are desired or foreseen, the act will be intentional and where the consequences of some act are neither desired not foreseen, the act will be unintentional.

Actus Reus:
The wrongful deed that comprises the physical components of a crime and that generally must be coupled with mens rea to establish criminal liability
Another principle of theoretical jurisprudence is that verbal evidence must in all the cases be direct and hearsay evidence is no evidence.
Evidence is the instrument in a court according to which cases are approved or rejected.

Definition of Evidence:


English Jurisprudence (12-10-2012)

Definition of Evidence:


Evidence and its kinds:

That which demonstrates, makes clear, or ascertains the truth of the very fact or point in issue;; or it is whatever is exhibited to a court or jury, whether it be by matter of record, or writing, or by the testimony of witnesses, in order to enable them to pronounce with certainty; concerning the truth of any matter in dispute. Evidence, in pr.; or it is that which is legally submitted to a jury, to enable them to decide upon the questions in dispute or issue, as pointed out by the pleadings and distinguished from all comment or argument. 1 Stark. Ev. 8. 2. Evidence may be considered with reference to, 1. The nature of the evidence. 2. The object of the evidence. 3. The instruments of evidence. 4. The effect of evidence. 1. As to its nature, evidence may be considered with reference to its being 1. Primary evidence. 2. Secondary evidence. 3. Positive. 4. Presumptive. 5. Hearsay. 6. Admissions.

Kinds of Evidence:

·         Primary evidence. The law generally requires that the best evidence the case admits of should be given.
·         Secondary evidence. That species of proof which is admissible on the loss of primary evidence, and which becomes by that even the best evidence.
·         3. Positive or direct evidence is that which, if believed, establishes the truth of a fact in issue, and does not arise from any presumption. Evidence is direct and positive, when the very facts in dispute are communicated by those who have the actual knowledge of them by means of their senses.
·         Presumptive evidence is that which is not direct, but where, on the contrary, a fact which is not positively known, is presumed or inferred from one or more other facts or circumstances which are known. Vide article Presumption, and Rosc
·         Hearsay, is the evidence of those who relate, not what they know themselves, but what they have heard from others.
·         Admissions are the declarations which parties by himself, or those who act under his authority, make of the existence of certain facts.
EVIDENCE, CIRCUMSTANTIAL. The proof of facts which usually attend other facts ought to be, proved; that which is not direct evidence. For example, when a witness testifies that a man was stabbed with a knife, and that a piece of the blade was found in the wound, and it is found to fit exactly with another part of the blade found in the possession of the prisoner; the facts are directly attested, but they only prove circumstances, and hence this is called circumstantial evidence.
2. Circumstantial evidence is of two kinds, namely, certain and uncertain. It is certain when the conclusion in question necessarily follows as, where a man had received a mortal wound, and it was found that the impression of a bloody left hand had been made on the left arm of the deceased, it was certain some other person than the deceased must have made such mark.
EVIDENCE, CONCLUSIVE. That which, while uncontradicted, satisfies the judge and jury it is also that which cannot be contradicted.
2. The record of a court of common law jurisdiction is conclusive as to the facts therein stated.
EVIDENCE, DIRECT. That which applies immediately to the fadum probandum, without any intervening process.
EVIDENCE, EXTRINSIC. External evidence or that which is not contained in the body of an agreement, contract, and the like.
2. It is a general rule that extrinsic evidence cannot be admitted to contradict, explain, vary or change the terms of a contract or of a will, except in a latent ambiguity, or to rebut a resulting trust.

Kinds of Evidence

v      Verbal/Oral Evidence
v      Documentary Evidence
v      Primary Evidence
v      Secondary Evidence
v      Circumstantial Evidence
v      Expert’s Evidence
v      Direct Evidence
v      Hearsay Evidence
v      Judicial Evidence
v      Extra-Judicial Evidence

In every case whether it is a civil or criminal case there is either question of law or question of fact.  A question which has been decided by law is the question of law.
A question which has not been decided by law is the law of fact.
Laws are not disproved through evidence, only facts are disproved.
Facts are proved and disproved through Evidence.
Facts admitted needs not to be proved.